Political Atmosphere In Rural Economic Develovment In Citengah Village, Sumedang Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v23i1.508Keywords:
Political Atmosphere, Rural Economic Development, Citengah Village, Bumdes, Development PolicyAbstract
Abstract
Rural economic development is an integral part of national development that is greatly influenced by local political dynamics. This study analyzes the relationship between political atmosphere and economic development in Citengah Village, Sumedang Regency. Using a qualitative approach, this study reveals that local political stability, development policies, and the role of political actors greatly determine the effectiveness of the implementation of village economic programs. The results of the study indicate that politicization of policies, uneven allocation of village funds, and lack of transparency in the management of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) are the main challenges in economic development in Citengah Village. However, this village also has great opportunities in developing an economy based on local resources, such as the agricultural and agro-tourism sectors. Community empowerment, strengthening the role of the village government, and optimizing BUMDes as an economic driver are the main strategies in realizing inclusive and sustainable development. This study recommends increasing transparency in village governance and synergy between the government, community, and private sector to support rural economic growth.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Business.
Almond, G. A., & Powell, G. B. (1966). Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Asongu, S. A., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2020). Governance, CO2 emissions and inclusive human development in sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 38(1), 18-36.
Bardhan, P. (1997). "Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues." Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320-1346.
Blanchard, O., & Shleifer, A. (2001). "Federalism with and without Political Centralization: China versus Russia." IMF Staff Papers, 48(1), 171-179.
Carothers, T. (2002). "The End of the Transition Paradigm." Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5-21.
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (Eds.). (2005). Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gerring, J., Thacker, S. C., & Alfaro, R. (2012). "Democracy and Human Development." The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 1-17.
Grindle, M. S. (2004). "Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries." Governance, 17(4), 525-548.
Haryatmoko, J. (2021). Tanggungjawab Etis Partai Politik: Memperluas Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Kebijakan Publik. A. Nawawi, Sinergi Penegakan Etika Kelembagaan, 119.
Hermawan, W., Sedarmayanti, S., Jubaedah, E., & Mulyaningsih, M. (2020). Implikasi Iklim Organisasi, Mutasi dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di BKPSDM Kabupaten Subang. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 17(2), 178-192.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). "Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996–2008." World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4978.
Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.
Mombeuil, C., & Diunugala, H. P. (2021). UN sustainable development goals, good governance, and corruption: The paradox of the world's poorest economies. Business and Society Review, 126(3), 311-338.
Mulyaningsih, M. (2017). Pengaruh Implementasi Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Transformasi Budaya Organisasi terhadap Manajemen Sekolah untuk Mewujudkan Efektivitas Penggunaan Budaya Sharing di Lingkungan Pendidikan. Jurnal Sekretaris dan Administrasi Bisnis, 1(1), 57-69.
Norris, P. (2012). Democratic Governance and Human Security: The Impact of Regimes on Prosperity, Welfare and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, M. (2000). Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships. New York: Basic Books.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rodrik, D. (2008). One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2015). Economic Development (12th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Transparency International. (2022). Corruption Perceptions Index 2022. Retrieved from www.transparency.org.
UNDP. (1997). Governance for Sustainable Human Development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
World Bank. (2020). The Role of Governance in Development Outcomes: Lessons from Global Case Studies. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yusuf, H. (2019). "Polarization and its Impact on Development Policies in Indonesia." Indonesian Political Review, 11(2), 45-62.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
