The Role of the Village Government in Improving Human Resource Development in Padaherang Village, Padaherang District, Pangandaran Regency

Authors

  • Dede Agus Norma Rohiman Universitas Galuh Ciamis, Indonesia
  • Regi Refian Garis Universitas Galuh Ciamis, Indonesia
  • Neti Sunarti Universitas Galuh Ciamis, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v23i2.632

Keywords:

Role of Village Government, Human Resources (HR), Padaherang Village

Abstract

This research is motivated by the suboptimal role of the Padaherang Village government in providing equitable access to education and training for the community. Skills training such as culinary arts, sewing, or organic farming is still rare and limited to specific groups such as the Family Welfare Movement (PKK) or the Youth Organization (Karang Taruna). Non-formal learning programs that can reach all ages are also underdeveloped, for example, there are no evening classes for illiterate adults or group learning activities at the village hall. Furthermore, the community's use of technology has not been directed towards productive activities. Although many residents own Android phones, their use is limited to basic communication and entertainment. Training to improve digital literacy, such as promoting MSME products or accessing online services, has never been conducted. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of the village government in human resource development. Using a qualitative descriptive method, the results show that of the five government roles according to P. Siagian's theory, the roles as stabilizer and innovator have not been optimally implemented. The main obstacles include limited funds, training personnel, internet infrastructure, and low community literacy. However, the role as a modernizer is beginning to be seen through the active involvement of residents. Efforts include collaborating with training institutions, submitting programs through village meetings, involving volunteers, and planning basic technology training for youth. The village government has also begun promoting the benefits of technology through community forums as part of its official work program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital, A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (3rd ed.). University of Chicag Press.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(S1), S95–S120.

Durkheim, E. (1893). The Division of Labor in Society. Free Press.

Imran, T., Ngala, E., Mambu, L., & Lapalelo, B. (2025). Pemberdayaan Pemuda Dan Penguatan Kompetensi SDM Dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Pengabdian, 4(1), 67-76.

Markhamah, M., Nindya, C. R., Marzalina, P., Susilowati, R., Puspitawati, Y., Li, S., & Hayati, N. (2021). Peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat berbasis potensi lokal. Muhammadiyah University Press.

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.

Merton, R. K. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press.

Moleong, Lexy J. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Parlina, N., & Sujanto, B. (2023). Teacher Digital Competencies (TDC): Strategi Peningkatan Kompetensi Digital Guru melalui Kepemimpinan Transformasional, Pelatihan dan Komunitas Praktik Virtual. Nas Media Pustaka.

Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Routledge.

Peraturan Menteri Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Prioritas Penggunaan Dana Desa Tahun 2019

Purnomo, Hadi. (2018). Peran Pemerintah Desa dalam Pembanguna Berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.

Rahmawati, D. (2020). Strategi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat melalui Pelatih Kewirausahaan di Desa. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over pr

Rostow, W. W. (1960). The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge University Press.

Santoso, Budi. (2020). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Perspektif Pembangunan Desa. Jakarta: Gramedia

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.

Soekanto, S. (2014). Sosiologi suatu pengantar (ed. revisi). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Todaro, Michael P. (2006). Economic Development. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Undang-undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa.

Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan

Wahid, W., Nawir, F., & Farhan, A. (2024). Kualitas sumber daya manusia sebagai aspek fundamental dalam menunjang perekonomian. Journal of Economics Research and Policy Studies, 4(2), 330-341.

Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(5), 725–750 https://journal.papsel.org/index.php/JHP/article/download/47/68/210 evention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(1), 1–25

Downloads

Published

31-08-2025

How to Cite

Dede Agus Norma Rohiman, Regi Refian Garis, & Neti Sunarti. (2025). The Role of the Village Government in Improving Human Resource Development in Padaherang Village, Padaherang District, Pangandaran Regency. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 23(2), 603–611. https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v23i2.632

Most read articles by the same author(s)