Internal and External Performance Evaluation Analysis (Sakip) at the Investment and One-Door Integrated Services Service (Dpmptsp) of East Java Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v23i3.829Keywords:
Accountability, DPMPTSP, Government Agency Performance, SAKIP, Performance EvaluationAbstract
This study analyzes the internal and external performance evaluation systems through the Government Agency Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) at the East Java Province Investment and One-Stop Integrated Services Agency (DPMPTSP). The research focuses on the internal performance evaluation mechanism, the external evaluation process, and factors influencing the quality of organizational performance. The study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques through interviews, observations, and documentation studies. The results show that internal evaluation is carried out through monitoring the implementation of the Work Plan and Action Plan uploaded to the SIAKIP system, but still faces technical and administrative obstacles, especially in utilizing the evaluation results for planning for the following year. External evaluations are conducted by six evaluators who produce SAKIP rankings, with the achievement of the East Java DPMPTSP score reaching 81.51 in 2024 with a ranking of 41st. Factors influencing performance quality include the alignment of planning documents, leadership involvement, internalization of work culture, consistency of monitoring and evaluation, and the suitability of performance reporting
Downloads
References
Anggono, A. (2022). Akuntansi manajemen pada entitas publik. Penerbit Adab.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-97166-000
Arofah, Z., & Basyar, M. R. (2024). Penggunaan SAKIP dalam mewujudkan good governance pada Kecamatan Genteng. Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 2(3), 106–115.
Asipi, L. S., Rosalina, U., & Nopiyadi, D. (2022). The analysis of reading habits using Miles and Huberman interactive model to empower students’ literacy at IPB Cirebon. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 2(3), 117–125.
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing performance: International comparisons. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891340
Febriyanti, A., Kanti, Y. S., & Pratama, S. G. (2025). Inovasi pelayanan publik terintegrasi dalam satu lokasi: Studi kasus Mal Pelayanan Publik (MPP) Surabaya. Jurnal Administrasi Politik dan Sosial, 6(2), 168–180.
Idalal, I. (2024). Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Dalam Implementasi Sakip Pada Dinas Perhubungan Kabupaten Barru (Doctoral Dissertation, Politeknik Stia Lan Makassar).
Malang, I. K. (2023). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik (JIAP).
Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Georgetown University Press.
https://press.georgetown.edu/Book/The-Dynamics-of-Performance-Management
Nani, F. L., Rowa, H., & Martini, A. (2021). Efektivitas sistem akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah di Kabupaten Sumba Timur. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Suara Khatulistiwa (JIPSK), 6(1), 102–111.
Poister, T. H., Aristigueta, M. P., & Hall, J. L. (2015). Managing and measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118906748
Pomo, E. A. V., & Pangerapan, S. F. (2025). Evaluasi Kebijakan Sistem Merit Di Badan Kepegawaian Dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Kota Tomohon (Doctoral dissertation, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri).
Pratama, R. K. (2025). Strategi kepala desa dalam meningkatkan kinerja pegawai di Desa Wonojati Kecamatan Jenggawah Kabupaten Jember. Majalah Ilmiah Cahaya Ilmu, 7(1), 22–38.
Primaningtyas, R., & Luayyi, S. (2025). Faktor internal dan eksternal dalam perolehan nilai evaluasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Otonomi, 25(2), 397–408.
Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238.
https://doi.org/10.2307/975901
Safira, P. I., & Malau, H. (2023). Efektivitas program penjenjangan kinerja organisasi perangkat daerah pada Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah di Kota Pariaman. PUBLICNESS: Journal of Public Administration Studies, 2(3), 274–280.
Sumual, F. M., Saerang, D. P. E., Karamoy, H., & Tawas, H. N. (2021). Revisiting the determinants of local government performance. Accounting, 7(7), 1751–1756.
Thamrin, P. A., Fandani, L. S., Maulidiyah, N., & Usman, W. R. (2025). Peran manajemen strategik dalam meningkatkan transparansi dan akuntabilitas di instansi pemerintah. Al-Mumtaz: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 69–79.
Zubarita, F. R. (2023). Politik hukum perubahan pengaturan jenis retribusi perizinan tertentu pasca diterbitkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 tentang Hubungan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
