Effectiveness of the intellectual property center program in the inventory and recording of communal intellectual property at BRIDA Gianyar Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v23i2.531Keywords:
Effectiveness, Communal Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Center, Registration, Legal Protection, BRIDA Gianyar Regency.Abstract
Communal Intellectual Property (KIK) is an important asset that includes traditional knowledge, cultural expressions, genetic resources, and geographical indications that are passed down from generation to generation in a community. To protect KIK from foreign claims and ensure that economic and cultural benefits continue to be enjoyed by the community of origin, the Indonesian government through the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DJKI) launched the Intellectual Property Center (Sentra-KI) Program. This program aims to inventory and record KIK as an initial step in legal protection. This study analyzes the effectiveness of the Sentra-KI Program at BRIDA Gianyar Regency in supporting KIK recording, and identifies factors that influence its success. The results of the study show that although this program has increased public awareness and provided a better recording system, there are still various obstacles, such as limited human resources, lack of public understanding, bureaucratic obstacles, and suboptimal digital infrastructure. To overcome these challenges, a more comprehensive strategy is needed, including improving education, digitizing services, strengthening partnerships with related institutions, optimizing budgets, and simplifying administrative procedures. By implementing effective strategies, the Sentra-KI Program is expected to improve the protection and sustainable use of KIK in Gianyar Regency.
Downloads
References
Agustino, L. (2017). Dasar-dasar Kebijakan Publik (Revisi). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Alfons, M. (2017). Implementasi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum. Legislasi Indonesia, 14, 357–368. http://ejurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/111/pdf
Amelia, T., Barthos, M., & Sara, R. (2023, November). Efektivitas Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual Pada Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah (UMKM) Dalam Mendukung Ekonomi Kreatif. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Universitas Borobudur Publikasi Hasil-Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-12).
Apriansyah, N. (2020). Analisis Layanan Publik Permohonan Pendaftaran Kekayaan Intelektual. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 14(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.v14.125-140
Arikunto, S. 2010. Metodelogi Penelitian Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Bina Aksara Baskoro. 2018. Pariwisata dan Perhotelan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Bire, C. M. D., Jacob, Y. M. Y., Nubatonis, O. J., Kaesmetan, R. M., & Nunuhitu, T. G. (2024). Sosialisasi Tentang Peningkatan Pengetahuan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal Bagi Masyarakat Desa Oelomin, Kecamatan Nekamese Kabupaten Kupang. Jurnal Abdi Insani, 11(4), 1637-1644.
Birkland, T. A. (2015). An Introduction to Policy Process: Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making.
Bungin, Burhan. (2018). Metode Penelitian Sosial & Ekonomi: Format-Format Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Untuk Studi Sosiologi, Kebijakan, Publik, Komunikasi, Manajemen, Dan Pemasara. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Goup.
Darnia, M. E., Coryna, J. A., Rizky, M. F., Rahimi, R. A. F., & Verdiansyah, V. (2024). Efektivitas Undang-Undang Merek Dalam Perlindungan Produk Karya Seni Tradisional. JLEB: Journal of Law, Education and Business, 2(1), 111-115.
Dwiputri, N. M., Kuspraningrum, E., Asufie, K. N., & Triyana, L. (2024). Pelindungan Tari Ganjur Sebagai Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Masyarakat Kutai di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP), 5(2).
Figueroa, M. & Barrios, C. (2021). The Role of Local Knowledge Hubs in Preserving Cultural Heritage. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26(3), 205-219
Fitria, T. A., Gunade, D. T., & Mariyati, A. (2025). Efektivitas Program Reintegrasi Sosial Narapidana Melalui Pembebasan Bersyarat (Pb) Di Balai Pemasyarakatan Kelas Ii Amuntai. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 2(2), 1088-1097.
Fowler, P., Charoenpot, T., & Chernkwanma, C. (2017). ASEAN and Intellectual Property: Will a Complicated History Lead to a Certain Future? Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal, 40(2), 167–222.
Garg, K. C., & Srivastava, J. (2016). Knowledge structure of IPR as reflected by the content analysis of papers published in journal of intellectual property rights. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21(3), 175–179.
Grindle, M. S. (1980). Politics and policy implementation in the third world. In Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World. Pricenton University Press, New Jersey.
Hendrix, T., & Isnasari, Y. (2016). Pemanfaatan Informasi Paten Pelet Biomassa untuk Meningkatkan Pengembangan Energi Terbarukan. 11th Annual Meeting on Testing and Quality, 337–347.
Hendrix, T., Isnasari, Y., Berliandaldo, M., & Kholiyah, S. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual Terhadap Efektivitas Produk Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 17(1), 41-64.
Herisetiawan, F., & Sari, P. (2023). Efektifitas Penerapan Sertifikat HKI sebagai Jaminan Kredit bagi Pelaku Ekonomi Kreatif dan UMKM. Syntax Idea, 5(12), 2395-2407.
Jones, C., O. (1991). An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. CA: Cole Publishing Co.
Kadji, Y. (2015). Formulasi dan Implementasi Kebijakan Publik: Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Birokrasi Dalam Fakta Realitas. Gorontalo: Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Press.
Lane, J., E., & Ersson, S. (2010). Policy Implementation in Poor Countries. Umea University, Sweden, 1–9.
Lindsey, T., Damian, E., Butt, S., & Utomo, T. S. (2006). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar. In Bandung: Asian Law Group Pty. Ltd. & PT Alumni. penerbit Alumni.
Marzali, A. (2012) Antropologi dan Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Miles, M.B, Huberman, A.M, dan Saldana, J. (2012). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press.
Mirza, I. M. M. (2022). Efektifitas Implementasi Tipografi dalam Desain Grafis Berdasarkan Perspektif Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI) di Indonesia. VISUALIDEAS, 2(2), 70-75.
Moleong, L. J. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda.
Moncada-paternò-castello, P., Moncada-paternò-castello, P., & Grassano, N. (2014). Innovation, Competitiveness and Growth Investment – A Country Approach: Italy JRC POLICY BRIEF Innovation, Competitiveness And Growth Without R & D. Analysis of Corporate R & D Investment - A country approach: Italy. November 2014, 1–16.
Nazia, F., & Widyastuti, T. V. (2023). Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual terhadap Produk Ekonomi Kreatif. Penerbit Nem.
Nugroho, S. (2017). Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Era Pasar Bebas ASEAN. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 24(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.24.2.164-178
Nusantari, I. A. A., Widnyani, I. A. P. S., & Kartika, I. M. (2023). Efektivitas Pelayanan Publik Terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas di Kelurahan Sesetan Kota Denpasar. Jurnal Widya Publika, 11(2), 133-145.
Pugatch, M., Torstensson, D., & Chu, R. (2016). Infinite Possibilities: US. Chamber International IP Index. February, 4–92. www.pugatch-consilium.com
Pund, E. S. R., & Yadav, R. (2017). Role of IPR in Ergonomic Product Development and Design. Journal of Ergonomics, 07(06), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165- 7556.1000e175
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Routledge; 1st Edition (March 7, 2007).
Sa’adah, Z. (2015). Jati Diri Bangsa Dan Potensi Sumber Daya Konstruktif Sebagai Aset Ekonomi Kreatif di Indonesia. Economia, 11(2), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v11i2.8239
Saputra, I. (2023). Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual UMKM Kabupaten Buton. Sultra Research of Law, 5(2), 43-57.
Schermerhorn, J. R. (1986). Management for Productivity (2nd ed.).
Senewe, E. V. T. (2015). Efektivitas Pengaturan Hukum Hak Cipta Dalam Melindungi Karya Seni Tradisional Daerah. Jurnal LPPM Bidang EkoSosBudKum (Ekonomi, Sosial, Budaya, dan Hukum), 2(2), 12-23.
Shanker, D. (2023). Cultural Expressions and Legal Mechanisms for Safeguarding Indigenous Knowledge. Springer Publishing.
Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. W. (2018). The Public Policy Theory Primer. In The Public Policy Theory Primer. Westview Press. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494352 Som, O. (2012). Innovation Without R&D (pp. 249–346). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Afabeta
Sugiyono. (2016). Memahami Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif R & D.Bandung : Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta,
Susanti, D. I. (2022). Eksplorasi Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal Berbasis Hak Asasi Manusia. Media Iuris, 5(3).
Usman, dan Akbar, P. S. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Weiss, C. H. (2022). Evaluation Research: Methods for Assessing Program Impact. Routledge.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2023). Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
