Supervision and Accountability of Sakip Performance: Evidence from the Tasikmalaya City Government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v24i1.980Keywords:
Government Oversight, Performance Accountability, SAKIP.Abstract
Public performance accountability has become a strategic requirement in modern governance, along with the increasing need for transparency and results-oriented governance. The Government Agency Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) was designed to ensure performance measurability, but its implementation at the regional level still faces substantial challenges. This study aims to analyze SAKIP performance oversight and accountability in the Tasikmalaya City Government using a strategic management approach. The theoretical study focuses on the concepts of public accountability, New Public Management, and strategic management. The research method employed a qualitative, descriptive-analytical approach through documentation studies, in-depth interviews, and observations, with interactive data analysis. The results indicate that SAKIP oversight is supported by adequate regulations and evaluation mechanisms, but it still tends to be administrative and does not fully meet the stated objectives. The discussion emphasizes the need for strengthening human resource capacity, consistent follow-up on recommendations, and integrating performance information systems so that SAKIP can function as a strategic instrument for improving local government performance
Downloads
References
Anggriani, A. (2016). Perkembangan paradigma administrasi publik (New Public Administration, New Public Management dan New Public Service). Jurnal Politik Profetik, 4(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.24252/profetik.v4i2a1
Benzaghta, M. A., Elwalda, A., Mousa, M. M., Erkan, I., & Rahman, M. (2021). SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review. Journal of Global Business Insights, 6(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Bowen, G. A. (2009).Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018).Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia. (2021).
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 88 Tahun 2021 tentang Evaluasi Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. (Official text available via Peraturan BPK: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id)
Kurniawan, R. (2020). Kepemimpinan kepala daerah dan implementasi SAKIP: Studi pada pemerintah daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 10(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.31289/jap.v10i1.3456
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015).
Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Republic of Indonesia. (2014).Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2014 tentang Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. (Official text available via Peraturan BPK: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id)
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018).
Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Surur, M. (2019). Birokrasi Weberian: “Proportional approach.” Madani: Jurnal Politik dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 11(2), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.53684/madani.v11i2.58
Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2012). Strategic management and business policy: Toward global sustainability (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
