SYNERGY BETWEEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND VILLAGE IN PROMOTING DIGITAL ECONOMY FOR POVERTY ALLEVIATION: A STUDY IN SURABAYA VILLAGE, LIMBANGAN SUBDISTRICT, GARUT REGENCY

Authors

  • Iin Endah Setyawati Universitas Al Ghifari Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v22i2.350

Keywords:

Digital Economy, Local Government, Poverty

Abstract

Poverty in rural Indonesia, including Surabaya Village in Balubur Limbangan District, Garut Regency, is a problem that requires innovative solutions. Limited market access, infrastructure and digital literacy are the main obstacles for local MSME players in marketing their products. This research analyzes collaboration between regional governments and village governments in developing the digital economy as an effort to eradicate poverty. Using descriptive qualitative methods, this research collects data through observation, interviews and documentation. The research results show that developing the digital economy through digital literacy training, developing telecommunications infrastructure, and local e-commerce platforms has the potential to increase market access for village MSME products, such as chips and handicrafts. In addition, effective collaboration between local and village governments plays a key role in overcoming obstacles, including lack of digital literacy and limited internet access. Challenges such as lack of synergy between parties and budget constraints still need to be overcome. Through an integrated strategy, digital economic development can empower the people of Surabaya Village, open up wider market opportunities, and reduce dependence on middlemen. This research concludes that government collaboration with a digital economic approach can accelerate poverty alleviation and sustainable development in rural areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Kemiskinan Dan Ketimpangan Pendapatan. Jakarta: BPS.

Babatunde, S. O., Okeleke, P. A., & Ijomah, T. I. (2022). The Role Of Digital Marketing In Shaping Modern Economies: An Analysis Of E-Commerce Growth And Consumer Behavior. Https://Doi.Org/10.51594/Ijmer.V4i12.1417

Cheong, H., Lyons, A., Houghton, R., & Majumdar, A. (2023). Secondary Qualitative Research Methodology Using Online Data Within The Context Of Social Sciences. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/16094069231180160

Dean, J. R. (2013). Book Review: What Is Qualitative Research?. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/1467-954X.12088

Dwiyanto, A. (2011). Mengelola Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Heyink, J., & Tymstra, T. (1993). The Function Of Qualitative Research. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/BF01079517

Holliday, A. (2012). Validity In Qualitative Research. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/9781405198431.WBEAL1243

Im, E. (2015). The Effects Of Interlocal Collaboration On Local Economic Performance: Investigation Of Korean Cases.

Jovanović, G. (2011). Toward A Social History Of Qualitative Research. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0952695111399334

Kabaji, E., & Mukanzi, C. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology In Social Science Research: Towards Relativist Ontology And Interpretivist-Constructivist Epistemology.

Kusumaningrum, S., Rahayu, T., & Hartono, A. (2023). Poverty And Social Exclusion In Rural Indonesia.

Mcgee, T. (2007). Book Review: Introduction To Social Research: Quantitative And Qualitative Approaches Keith F. Punch. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/14407833070110030604

Mohajan, H. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology In Social Sciences And Related Subjects. Https://Doi.Org/10.26458/JEDEP.V7I1.571

Negou, E., Fonkem, M. N., Abenwi, J. S., & Ibrahima. (2023). Qualitative Research Methodology In Social Sciences. Https://Doi.Org/10.18535/Ijsrm/V11i09.Sh01

Pasholikov, M. (2023). Digital Economy: A Marketing Approach. Https://Doi.Org/10.1117/12.2669494

Pipit Buana Sari. (2018). Inklusi Keuangan Digital Di Pedesaan Indonesia.

Prasojo, R. N. (2018). Reformasi Birokrasi Dan Good Governance. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Putri, R. A., & Kurniawati, D. (2023). The Role Of Government In Alleviating Rural Poverty: A Policy Analysis.

Rahman Fathor, Dahlan, M., & Hefni, W. (2022). Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Ekonomi Digital Berbasis Desa Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Resiliensi Ekonomi Masyarakat Desa Pasca Pandemi. The 4th International Conference On University-Community Engagement (ICON-UCE) IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, 245–55.

Rahmatullah, A., & Zainuddin, M. (2021). Structural Poverty And The Role Of Social Capital In Indonesia.

Rozikin, M., & Sofwani, A. (2023). Joint Collaboration Of The Local Government (Regency, City, And Province) For The Successful Development In East Java Of Indonesia. Https://Doi.Org/10.55908/Sdgs.V11i11.1354

Rusdianasari. (2018). Fintech And The Acceleration Of MSME Growth.

Suharto, E. (2009). Kemiskinan Dan Perlindungan Sosial Di Indonesia: Menggagas Model Jaminan Sosial Universal Bidang Kesehatan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Soo, Y. (2020). The Study On The Social Science Methodology: Focusing On Change In The Behavior Of Policymakers. Https://Doi.Org/10.47577/TSSJ.V6I1.304

Turyandi, I. (2020). Actionpreneur: Teori Dan Implementasi Usaha Baru. In Zenodo (CERN European Organization For Nuclear Research). Https://Doi.Org/10.5281/Zenodo.3815723

Wicaksono, I. (2021). Integration Of Development Programs Based On Collaborative Governance On Regional Policies And Village. Https://Doi.Org/10.32528/POLITICO.V21I1.5442

Downloads

Published

31-08-2024

How to Cite

Iin Endah Setyawati. (2024). SYNERGY BETWEEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND VILLAGE IN PROMOTING DIGITAL ECONOMY FOR POVERTY ALLEVIATION: A STUDY IN SURABAYA VILLAGE, LIMBANGAN SUBDISTRICT, GARUT REGENCY. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 22(2), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v22i2.350