Evaluation of Employee Performance in the Secretariat Field of the Department of Community and Village Empowerment of Pasuruan Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54783/dialektika.v22i2.303Keywords:
Evaluation, Employee Performance, ASN Professionalism IndexAbstract
Performance evaluation is an assessment of the work results or achievements attained by an organization, team, or individual. Conducting performance evaluations can help identify areas for improvement. The Secretariat of the Community and Village Empowerment Office in Pasuruan Regency has a low professionalism index, which is due to issues within the performance dimensions of the ASN (State Civil Apparatus). These dimensions include the assessment of Employee Performance Targets (SKP) and the work behavior of ASN employees, as well as identifying programs that have not been implemented. This study aims to evaluate employee performance using Robbins' theory of dimensions and performance indicators, which include: Quality, Quantity, Responsibility, Cooperation, and Initiative. It also seeks to identify the supporting and inhibiting factors of employee performance in the Secretariat of the Community and Village Empowerment Office of Pasuruan Regency. The study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation. The research results show that employee performance is still not optimal when viewed from Robbins' theory in (Mangkunegara, 2015). Supporting factors include the majority of employees being competent and the continuous updating of the application system. However, inhibiting factors include an insufficient number of human resources, poor communication between policymakers and employees, and the absence of technical training (BIMTEK) for updated or new applications
References
Direktorat Kepegawaian Negara. (2019). Pedoman Tata Cara dan Pelaksanaan Pengukuran Indeks Profesionalitas Aparatur Sipil Negara. 021, 1–27. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/140312/peraturan-bkn-no-8-tahun-2019
FAJRIA, W. (2022). Analisis Kinerja Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) Pada Dinas Syariat Islam Aceh. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/19506
Mangkunegara. (2015). Manajemen sumber daya manusia perusahaan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Moleong, J. (2009). Lexy, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakaya.
Putra, R. E. (2021). Kinerja badan kepegawaian daerah dalam pengembangan kompetensi aparatur sipil negara provinsi jambi. 1–14.
Raco, J. (2010). Metode penelitian kualitatif: jenis, karakteristik dan keunggulannya.
Ramdani, R., Herabudin, H., & Salamatul, S. (2022). Evaluasi Kinerja Pegawai Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Kota Bandung Tahun 2020. Jurnalku, 2(4), 396–409. https://doi.org/10.54957/jurnalku.v2i4.278
Rizqyanto, M. F., Santoso, S., & Hanani, R. (2024). Implementasi Kebijakan Pengukuran Profesionalitas ASN Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 38 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengukuran Indeks Profesionalitas Aparatur Sipil Negara di Bagian Organisasi Sekretariat Daer. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 11(3), 308–323.
Saldana, J., Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Unite States of America: SAGE Publication.
Simanjuntak, P. J. (2005). Manajemen dan evaluasi kinerja. Language, 17(154p).
Sinambela, L. P. (2021). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Membangun tim kerja yang solid untuk meningkatkan kinerja. Bumi Aksara.
Widiaswari, R. R., Kerja, P., Jawab, T., & Performance, W. (2021). Evaluasi Kinerja Pegawai Evaluation of Employee Performance At Barito Kuala District. 5(2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.35722/pubbis
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.