The Dilemma of AI Surveillance In the Rule of Law: Challenges to Privacy Rights and Civil Liberties from the Perspectives of International and Asean Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v24i2.1115Keywords:
AI Surveillance, Human Rights, Privacy, International Law.Abstract
The implementation of Artificial Intelligence–based surveillance technologies (AI Surveillance), such as facial recognition and predictive behavioral analysis, has become a primary instrument in maintaining national security. However, the use of these technologies frequently comes into conflict with the protection of human rights. This study is motivated by the growing risk of state transformation into a surveillance state capable of conducting mass and automated monitoring of citizens, which may undermine the right to privacy and restrict anonymous freedom of expression in public spaces. The research addresses two main questions: (1) What international standards govern the limitation of AI Surveillance to prevent violations of the right to privacy? and (2) How do ASEAN countries comparatively regulate the accountability of governmental use of surveillance technologies? This research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing a conceptual approach to examine theories of privacy in the digital era, a statutory approach through the analysis of international legal instruments such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and a comparative approach focusing on ASEAN countries, particularly Indonesia, Singapore, and the Philippines. The findings indicate that most regulatory frameworks in the ASEAN region continue to grant excessively broad discretion to states to conduct surveillance under the justification of national security, often without independent judicial oversight mechanisms. The study concludes that a significant legal gap exists in mitigating discriminatory abuses of AI Surveillance. Accordingly, this research recommends the establishment of a strict “necessity and proportionality test” for all uses of AI in public surveillance, as well as the strengthening of the independence of data protection supervisory authorities at the regional ASEAN level.
Downloads
References
Bentham, Jeremy. Panopticon; or, The Inspection-House. London: T. Payne, 1791.
Bivitri Susanti, “The Implementation Gap of Data Protection Law in Indonesia,” Indonesia Law Review 12, no. 3 (2022): 345–360.
Chesterman, Simon. One Nation Under Surveillance: A New Social Contract to Defend Freedom Without Sacrificing Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Dicey, A. V. (1885). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. Macmillan.
Djafar, Wahyudi. “Hak atas Privasi dan Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia.” Jurnal HAM 10, no. 2 (2019): 123–138.
David Lyon, Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2001), 56–59.
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.
Government of Singapore, Smart Nation: The Way Forward (Singapore: Prime Minister’s Office, 2018).
Greenleaf, Graham. Asian Data Privacy Laws: Trade and Human Rights Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Human Rights Watch. “License to Kill”: Philippine Police Killings in Duterte’s “War on Drugs”. New York: Human Rights Watch, 2017.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 196.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi, Pasal 50.
Kaye, David. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression. UN Doc. A/HRC/41/35. Geneva: United Nations, 2019.
National Privacy Commission (Philippines). Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Data Privacy Act of 2012. Manila, 2016.
Republic of the Philippines. Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173).
Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, and Luciano Floridi, “Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation,” International Data Privacy Law 7, no. 2 (2017): 76–99
Simon Chesterman, One Nation Under Surveillance: A New Social Contract to Defend Freedom Without Sacrificing Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 84–92.
Singapore. Personal Data Protection Act 2012. Singapore Statutes.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2004). On the rule of law: History, politics, theory. Cambridge University Press.
United Nations, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171, art. 17.
United Nations. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. New York: United Nations, 1966.
United Nations, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, GA Res. 217 A (III), 10 December 1948, art. 12.
United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: United Nations, 1948.
United Nations Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 16: Article 17 (Right to Privacy). UN Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9 (Vol. I). Geneva: United Nations, 1988.
United Nations General Assembly, The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age, UN Doc. A/RES/73/179, 17 December 2018.
United Nations Human Rights Council. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy. UN Doc. A/HRC/48/31. Geneva: United Nations, 2021.
United Nations Human Rights Council. Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Situation of Human Rights in the Philippines. UN Doc. A/HRC/44/22. Geneva: United Nations, 2020.
United Nations Human Rights Council, Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Situation of Human Rights in the Philippines, UN Doc. A/HRC/44/22 (2020), paras. 56–61
United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








