Sustainability Accounting Adoption: The Impact of ESG Dimensions on Managerial Decision-Making

Authors

  • Albertus Karjono Institut Bisnis Nusantara Jakarta
  • Edi Wahyu Wibowo Institut Bisnis Nusantara Jakarta
  • Bambang Wahyudi Wicaksono Institut Bisnis Nusantara Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v24i2.1111

Keywords:

Sustainability, Digitalization, ESG, Financial Performance, Firm Value (MV/BV), FinTech, Greenwashing, GCG

Abstract

Contemporary developments in corporate management reveal an increasing emphasis on sustainability manifested through Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives and digitalization as key determinants of financial performance and firm value. This literature review aims to analyze the complex and dynamic interplay between corporate sustainability and digital disruption, as well as their impact on corporate financial performance and firm value. The analysis is based on a review of studies within the accounting and finance domains that predominantly employ quantitative approaches. Common methodologies found in the reviewed research include longitudinal panel econometric models and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Data were sourced from secondary datasets, such as global financial databases and corporate annual reports. Key variables were measured using both accounting perspectives (Return on Assets) and market perspectives (Market Value to Book Value) to assess financial performance and firm value. The findings support a positive and significant relationship between sustainability performance and financial performance, as measured by both ROA and MV/BV. High-quality environmental accounting disclosure is significantly associated with a lower cost of equity, indicating that investors prioritize sustainability factors in their investment decisions. Digital disruption and financial technology (FinTech) act as transformative forces. FinTech exerts a strong, positive, and significant direct impact on the adoption of sustainable finance practices and enhances the integration of ESG into financial reporting (FRESGI). Digital transformation was found to positively moderate the relationship between financial performance (ROA) and business sustainability, thereby reinforcing the positive effect. However, cross-sector interactions involving corporate sustainability and public sector financial or technological agendas can exert a negative moderating effect on ESG integration, suggesting structural friction or a misalignment of priorities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdel, K., & Luther. (2008). The Impact of Firm Characteristics on MAnagement Accounting Practices: A UK-Based Empirical Analysis. The British Accounting Review.

Abu-Allan, A. (2024). The impact of balanced scorecard mediation in the relationship of perceived environmental uncertainty, business strategy, and organizational performance. 12(2), 737–750. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 737-750. doi:https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2024.1.012

Adeniran, A., & Obembe, O. (2020). The significance of strategic management accounting on the performance of transport businesses in Nigeria. Insights Into Regional Development, 1.

Anca, I., & Rainer, L. (2015). Does the BSC Improve Performance? A Review of the Empirical Literature. Aarhus University; School of Business and Social Sciences, Management Accounting and Control Program, 1.

Baines, A., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2003). Antecedents to management accounting change: A structural equation approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7-8), 675-698.

Beloudah, F., Abdalah, A., & Mohammed, M. (2023). Belouadah, F., Abdallah, A. S. R., & Mohammed, M. O. M. (2023). Dimensions of Sustainable Development in Rationalizing Decisions To Grant Green Finance in Saudi Banks. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(53), 32-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.6.53.2023.4200

Beredugo, S., & Mefor, I. (2012). The impact of environmental accounting and reporting on sustainable development in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3(7), 55-63.

Difalla, S., & Belouadah, F. (2022). Testing the Information Content of Sustainability Reports for Telecommunications Companies in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia . Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business, 9(10), 137-145. doi:https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no10.0137

Duong, N., & Ha, Q. (2021). The Impacts of Social Sustainability Practices on Supply Chain Performance: Mediating Role of Supply Chain Integration. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(11), 37-48. doi:https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.11.202111.37

Gray, R., Brennan, A., & Malpas, J. (2014). New accounts: Towards a reframing of social accounting. Accounting Forum, 38(4), 258-273.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hussaien, A., Abdelraheem, A., Khogly, M., Mohmed, T., Mehaouat, L., & Elbokhari, Y. (2021). Disclosure of social responsibility and the competitive advantage at Sudan industrial companies. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences,, 8(4), 54-60.

Kandakoglu, A., Frini, A., & Ben Amor, S. (2019). Multicriteria decision making for sustainable development: A systematic review. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 26(5-6), 202-251.

Kurniawan, P., & Sawarjuwono, T. (2024). KThe Possibility of Sustainability Accounting Implementation in Village Owned Enterprise. Journal Kajian Akuntansi, 7(2), 254-269. doi:https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.vol7.no2.a9

Musa, A. (2024). The Role of Sustainability Accounting on Decision Making: Field Study on Sudanese Industrial Companies. Financial and Credit Activity:Problems of Theory and Practice, 111-121.

Outley. (2016). The Contingency Theory of Management Accounting and Control:1980-2014. Management Accounting Research.

Oyewo, B. (2022). Balanced Scorecard usage and organizational effectiveness: Evidence from manufacturing sector. Measuring Business Excellence.

Ozili, P. (2021). Sustainability Acconting. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Palm, C., Cornell, S., & Hayha, T. (2021). Making Resilient Decisions for Sustainable Circularity of Fashion. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1(2), 651-670.

Pires, R., Alves, M., & Fernandes, C. (2023). The Usefulness of Accounting Information and MAnagement Accounting Practice Under Environmental Uncertainty. Journal of risk and Financial Management, 102.

Sharma, R., & Maurya, S. (2025). The role of accounting information in strategic management . International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(SI-1), 173-176. doi:https://doi.org/10.14419/n9qxgx27

Stroher, T., Korner, M., Paetzold, F., & Struker, J. (2025). Bridging carbon data’s organizational boundaries: toward automated data sharing in sustainable supply chains. Electronic Markets, 35(33), 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00779-7

Wahyudi, I., Unggul, U., Mahroji, M., & Unggul, U. (2024). Sustainability In Accounting Education: A New Approach For The 21st Century. 1, pp. 1127-1138. Jakarta: IAI.

Downloads

Published

01-08-2026

How to Cite

Albertus Karjono, Edi Wahyu Wibowo, & Bambang Wahyudi Wicaksono. (2026). Sustainability Accounting Adoption: The Impact of ESG Dimensions on Managerial Decision-Making. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 24(2), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v24i2.1111